Chemical Naming & Substance Identity
Where each spelling is used, what it actually refers to, and how to write the order so the right material ships — for Thiamine (Vitamin B1).
Yes. “Thiamine” is the standard trade and pharmacopoeial spelling of vitamin B1; “thiamin” is the equally valid biochemical short form. Identical CAS 59-43-8 either way.
Both names map to CAS 59-43-8 (C12H17N4OS+, 265.36 g/mol). The difference is orthographic: one spelling is the systematic or international form, the other the regional variant.
| Attribute | Thiamine | Thiamin |
|---|---|---|
| Refers to | Thiamine (Vitamin B1) | Thiamine (Vitamin B1) |
| CAS Registry Number | 59-43-8 | 59-43-8 |
| Molecular formula | C12H17N4OS+ | C12H17N4OS+ |
| Molar mass | 265.36 g/mol | 265.36 g/mol |
| Typical name domain | One is IUPAC/international, the other regional | One is IUPAC/international, the other regional |
| Chemically different substance? | No | No |
| Lewis structure guide | Thiamine Lewis structure | Thiamin Lewis structure |
Identical CAS, formula and molar mass on both sides is the proof of identity: the difference is purely in how the name is written.
The difference is orthographic: one spelling is the systematic or international form, the other the regional variant.
“Thiamine” is the standard trade and pharmacopoeial spelling of vitamin B1; “thiamin” is the equally valid biochemical short form. Identical CAS 59-43-8 either way.
Dictionaries and CAS registry records often carry the US spelling, pharmacopoeias and international standards the systematic one, and older literature may use either. Neither is an error; they are the same entry searched under two orthographies.
| Context | Term Used | What Must Be Verified |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacopoeial | Thiamine hydrochloride / mononitrate | Named salt monographs define purity tests. |
| Literature | Thiamin | Common in enzyme and pathway papers. |
| Label/COA | CAS + salt form + assay | The fields that identify what was bought. |
Salt form (67-03-8 HCl, 619-32-9 mononitrate) drives stability, flow and dosing calculations; the spelling difference is purely orthographic.
Because the substance is identical either way, grade and documentation do the real separating: pharmacopoeial vs food vs technical grade, assay basis, impurity limits (heavy metals, residual solvents, water), container size and, for stereochemical names, an optical-purity clause.
Yes. “Thiamine” is the standard trade and pharmacopoeial spelling of vitamin B1; “thiamin” is the equally valid biochemical short form.
Both map to CAS 59-43-8.Both are accepted, but in different domains: The difference is orthographic: one spelling is the systematic or international form, the other the regional variant.
Controlled documents should use the qualified form and always add the CAS.Name plus CAS plus grade plus quantity. For Thiamine (Vitamin B1) the CAS alone removes every ambiguity created by spelling, shorthand or stereochemistry prefixes.
Yes — and that is precisely why the specification, not the name, decides what ships. The difference is orthographic: one spelling is the systematic or international form, the other the regional variant.
Editorial note
This article clarifies naming equivalence for procurement and documentation use. It is not legal or regulatory advice; the controlled source for any label is the current monograph, CAS index entry and applicable market regulations.