Hydrolyzed keratin, CAS 69430-36-0, is a protein hydrolysate obtained from keratin-rich animal materials such as wool, feathers, hair and horn by acid, alkaline or enzymatic cleavage of the highly crosslinked keratin structure into peptides and polypeptides. It is traded as a spray-dried powder or a preserved aqueous solution and graded above all by molecular weight distribution, because low molecular peptides and high molecular polypeptides behave differently on hair and skin. The principal outlet is cosmetic and personal care under the INCI name Hydrolyzed Keratin.
Because keratin is animal-derived, source declaration is the decisive compliance issue rather than the chemistry. European buyers must reconcile animal by-product rules under Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 142/2011, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy traceability and country of origin, while cosmetic use must respect Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009, including its treatment of materials of human origin. Religious and lifestyle acceptance then applies as a commercial gate: halal and kosher certification can be arranged, but a vegan claim cannot.
This paper examines what a sourcing or compliance evaluation must settle: how disulfides are cleaved and what that does to amino acid integrity; why molecular weight banding drives performance; how wool, feather and other sources differ in traceability and residue risk; the specification set covering protein content, amino acid profile, ash, heavy metals and microbiology; the boundary between cosmetic and medical claims; and the packaging and import practice that keeps an animal-derived ingredient moving.
Keratin is not an ordinary protein. Its polypeptide chains are crosslinked by disulfide bonds from a cystine content far above that of most structural proteins, and that crosslinking makes raw keratin insoluble and resistant to proteolysis. Useful hydrolysate therefore requires two operations: cleavage or rearrangement of disulfides to open the structure, and controlled cleavage of peptide bonds to reach a target molecular weight. What the finished ingredient does on hair is then a size effect.
Production begins with sorting, washing and defatting the raw material, then opens the structure and hydrolyses it. Alkaline hydrolysis with lime or caustic soda under heat is traditional and cheap but harsh; acid hydrolysis followed by neutralisation is common and effective; enzymatic hydrolysis with keratinases or proteases after a reduction or thermal pretreatment is milder and preserves amino acids better. The difficult half is downstream: decolourising, filtering, demineralising, banding by ultrafiltration and drying without generating colour, odour or microbial load.
Three currents define the market. Professional hair care and the bond-building category keep cosmetic demand strong even as retail matures, because keratin peptides deliver conditioning performance that plant proteins only partly match. Against that, clean beauty and vegan positioning push brands toward plant hydrolysates and fermentation-derived bio-identical peptides, so suppliers without a non-animal option are designed out of brand formulations. The third current is valorisation: feather and wool waste is increasingly treated as feedstock rather than disposal cost.
Capacity follows the raw material. China hosts the largest conversion base, with feather and wool hydrolysis and amino acid plants in Shandong, Hebei, Sichuan and Jiangsu supplying cosmetic distributors as well as feed and fertiliser producers. Europe holds specialised cosmetic ingredient producers in Italy, Spain, France and Germany working mainly with wool and feather from approved establishments under strict by-product documentation. India combines large poultry and leather industries with a growing cosmetic export base, and Australia and New Zealand supply much of the high-quality wool.
Quotations split by grade more sharply than by volume. Technical and feed grades track rendered feather meal, while cosmetic grade commands a substantial multiple reflecting enzymatic processing, ultrafiltration banding, colour and odour control, heavy metal and microbiological testing, preservative system and documentation. Enzymatic grades and quaternised derivatives sit higher again, and fermentation-derived bio-identical peptides remain a small premium market. Buyers should normalise to protein content and to a stated molecular weight band with a named method.
Three compliance lanes intersect. The cosmetic lane covers ingredient status, safety assessment, notification, labelling and claims. The animal lane covers by-product classification, processing method, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy traceability and import health controls. The destination lane covers national regimes: European cosmetics regulation, United States MoCRA obligations, and China's inventory and registration system. A supplier can pass every chemical test and still be unsaleable if one lane is incomplete.
Hydrolyzed keratin has an unusually favourable origin story and an unusually hostile positioning problem. It upcycles feather and wool waste that would otherwise be rendered or landfilled, a genuine circular economy argument. It is also animal-derived, which excludes it from vegan-certified products and exposes it to animal welfare scrutiny, while processing generates high chemical oxygen demand effluent and significant drying energy.
Most of the footprint sits in conversion rather than the raw material, which arrives as a slaughter or shearing by-product carrying a small allocated burden. Concentration and spray drying dominate energy use, hydrolysis and neutralisation generate saline, high chemical oxygen demand effluent that must be treated, and membrane cleaning adds a smaller load. Suppliers should state an ISO 14067 figure with the allocation rule declared and the drying step included.
Traceability obligations are layered. Animal by-product documentation must identify the establishment, category and processing method, and European imports require advance notification through the TRACES system and veterinary checks at a border control post with the corresponding health documentation, making this a logistics requirement as much as a quality one. Halal and kosher certification requires segregated campaigns and, for kosher, avoidance of mixing with non-kosher species in shared equipment. Vegan-positioned customers instead need fermentation-derived or plant protein material with a segregation certificate.
The material moves as a hygroscopic powder or as a preserved aqueous solution, and each form fails differently. Powders cake, pick up moisture and support microbial growth once opened; solutions can ferment, lose preservative efficacy and darken if they are held warm. Grading, packaging and transport therefore have to protect against moisture, heat and contamination, and the documentation has to survive customs inspection at the same time, because animal-derived consignments are inspected more often than synthetic ones.
Powder is normally non-hazardous and shipped ambient, but animal-derived consignments into the European Union require TRACES notification and presentation at a designated border control post with the relevant health documentation, and several markets require a veterinary certificate or import permit, so transit planning includes regulatory lead time and not just freight. Liquid grades need protection from freezing and sustained heat. Buyers should confirm that the commercial document, the certificate of analysis and any halal or kosher certificate carry the same batch and species declaration.
Winning in this ingredient means treating source documentation and molecular weight data as part of the product. The priorities below reflect how cosmetic, leather and feed customers actually qualify a keratin supplier.
Hydrolyzed keratin is a performance ingredient with a provenance problem. Its value rests on real chemistry: a cystine-rich protein that, once its disulfides are opened and its chains cut to a defined size, delivers substantivity and film formation that alternatives only partly reproduce. Its risk rests upstream of the reactor: which species and tissue, from which country, processed by which authorised method, with which residues, documented consistently enough to satisfy a safety assessor, a border veterinarian and a brand owner's vegan policy.
Suppliers who productise that documentation, band their grades by molecular weight with declared methods, control residues and microbiology, and offer a credible non-animal alternative will keep access to brand-sensitive customers as vegan reformulation accelerates. Buyers should specify species, origin, molecular weight band, residue limits and preservative system rather than protein content alone. Those disciplines, not price per kilogram, determine who remains qualified in this market.
Powered by Guidechem
This white paper is exclusively compiled by the Guidechem Intelligence Team based on global customs data, regulatory databases, and industry research. Guidechem is a leading global B2B chemical platform, dedicated to connecting global buyers with verified, high-quality manufacturers.
Relying on Guidechem's extensive global database, we have mapped the core participants in the current global Hydrolyzed keratin supply chain:
Disclaimer: The content of this white paper is compiled based on public market data and regulatory information available as of 2026. Global chemical regulations are subject to dynamic adjustments. In actual export operations, enterprises must consult professional regulatory advisors or relevant competent authorities to obtain the latest compliance guidance.
![]() |