Sodium Bromate

# Recent Market Dynamics and Analysis of Sodium Bromate

---

## I. Recent Quotation Trends (Mid-October to November 12, 2026)

| Date | Quoting Entity | Purity/Spec | Quote (CNY/ton) | Delivery Location | Packaging | Validity |
|------|----------------|-------------|-----------------|-------------------|-----------|----------|
| Nov 6–10 | Jiangsu Xile Energy Co., Ltd. | 99.5% | **38,000** (flat for 5 consecutive days) | Shandong Province | 25 kg/bag | 7 days |
| Jan 12 (Historical Ref.) | Shandong Hongyang Chemical Co., Ltd. | 99.5% | 33,000 | Shandong Province | — | — |
| Jan 12 (Historical Ref.) | Shandong Zhihengda Import & Export Co., Ltd. | 99.5% | 33,000 | Shandong Province | — | — |
| Jan 12 (Historical Ref.) | Jiangsu Xinsu New Materials Co., Ltd. | 99.5% | 39,000 | Jiangsu Province/Suzhou | — | — |

**Key Findings:** From November 6 to 10, Jiangsu Xile Energy maintained a locked quote of 38,000 CNY/ton for five consecutive trading days, showing a typical \"sideways anchoring\" pattern. Historical data indicates that quotes from the Shandong production area are approximately 5,000–6,000 CNY/ton lower than those from Jiangsu, reflecting a significant regional price gap.

---

## II. Market Characteristics Analysis

1. **Price Center: High-Level Stagnation with Lack of Direction**
The mainstream quote for sodium bromate (99.5% purity) is currently concentrated around **38,000 CNY/ton**, representing an approximate 15% increase from the early-year level of 33,000 CNY/ton in the Shandong production area. However, quotes have remained completely flat over the past week, indicating a stalemate between bullish and bearish forces—sellers are reluctant to sell and are propping up prices, while buyers are waiting and observing to suppress prices, resulting in thin trading volumes.

2. **Regional Divergence: Lower in Shandong, Higher in Jiangsu, Driven by Logistics Costs**
As a traditional concentration area for sodium bromate production, Shandong has long maintained quotes 5,000–6,000 CNY/ton lower than Jiangsu. This price gap is essentially a composite reflection of **logistics costs, brand premium, and regional supply-demand differences**. The premium/discount (C value) in the SunSirs pricing model covers such factors.

3. **Supply Side: Warning Signal from Declining Import Volume and Price**
The simultaneous decline in import volume and price for sodium and potassium bromide in September has released a warning signal. Sodium bromate and sodium bromide both belong to the bromine-based product family, and fluctuations in upstream bromine raw material prices will be directly transmitted. If bromine supply becomes loose and import costs decrease, the cost support for sodium bromate will be weakened.

4. **Demand Side: Limited Downstream Support**
Sodium bromate is mainly used in textile printing and dyeing, water treatment, and pharmaceutical intermediates. Currently, the operating rate of the printing and dyeing industry is only about 54%, which is approximately 14 percentage points lower year-on-year. The weak demand-side situation is evident and cannot effectively prop up prices.

---

## III. Trend Judgment and Forecast

| Dimension | Judgment |
|-----------|----------|
| **Short-term (1–2 weeks)** | Prices are likely to remain in a narrow range around 38,000 CNY/ton. The flat quotes for five consecutive days have formed a short-term price anchor, and there is a lack of catalysts to break the stalemate. |
| **Medium-term (1–3 months)** | Bearish pressure is gradually increasing. If upstream bromine continues to weaken and downstream printing and dyeing demand shows no improvement, prices may fall back to the 35,000–36,000 CNY/ton range. |
| **Risk Warning** | If environmental production restrictions are tightened or supply disruptions occur in major bromine production areas, prices may rebound counter-trend to above 40,000 CNY/ton. |

**Core Logic:** Sodium bromate is currently caught in a triple squeeze of \"high costs, weak demand, and stable supply.\" The quote of 38,000 CNY/ton is more of a psychological bottom line for producers rather than a market equilibrium price. Before a trend-based improvement in downstream demand occurs, a gradual downward shift in the price center is a high-probability event. However, the space for a sharp drop is limited by cost support, resulting in a pattern of \"slow, grinding decline.\"