Post My RFQ   |
Home > GuideTrends  > Fine Chemicals  > Dimethylaminopropylamine diisopropanol

Dimethylaminopropylamine diisopropanol

  • 30000CNY/TON Updated: 2026-04-16
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):30000 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):High
    Follow Comparison
Prices

Dimethylaminopropylamine diisopropanol Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

Dimethylaminopropylamine diisopropanol Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/04/14 2026/04/15 2026/04/16 ChangeUnit Comparison

Dimethylaminopropylamine diisopropanol Market Analysis

I. Market Price Dynamics
1. Core Supplier Quotations
- Hubei Jusheng Technology Co., Ltd.: Quoted at RMB 4/kg (25 kg/drum specification) on April 1, 2026; updated information as of April 15, 2026 indicates a suggested list price of RMB 1/kg—likely a symbolic price for a minimum order quantity of 1 kg, while the prevailing transaction price remains RMB 4/kg.
- Suzhou Senfeida Chemical Co., Ltd.: Quoted at RMB 66,000/ton (99% purity) on March 25, 2026; this price has remained unchanged for three consecutive weeks and stands at a historical high.
- Other supplier quotations: Hubei Guangao Biotechnology Co., Ltd. quotes RMB 50/kg; Wuhan Haorong Biotechnology Co., Ltd. quotes RMB 80/kg—demonstrating pronounced price dispersion, reflecting a tiered market pricing structure.

2. Regional Market Divergence
- Yangtze River Delta region (e.g., Shanghai, Jiangsu): Premium-market quotations concentrate in the range of RMB 65,000–66,000/ton, supported by localized service demand and exhibiting clear price premiums.
- Shandong and Hubei regions: Quotations as low as RMB 5,880/ton (Hubei Hengjiu Chemical, 99.9% purity); however, this price may correspond to isopropanol raw material or lower-purity products, differing significantly from core specifications.

3. Raw Material Cost Pass-Through
- Isopropanol benchmark price: RMB 6,566.66/ton on April 15, 2025—down 1.25% from the beginning of the month. However, prices exhibited sharp volatility from late March to early April 2026 (e.g., falling to RMB 2,500/ton on March 31, rebounding to RMB 6,000/ton on April 5), intensifying cost-side uncertainty.

II. Market Driving Factor Analysis
1. Supply Chain Regionalization
- Yangtze River Delta suppliers have established service barriers via “warehouse networks + 24-hour delivery,” enabling pricing autonomy independent of cost fluctuations—for example, Shanghai Shijian Chemical quotes RMB 10,000/ton (premium grade).
- Shandong and Jiangsu suppliers leverage port logistics advantages for price-based competition, albeit with constrained service responsiveness—for example, Shandong Lihua Yi quotes RMB 7,500/ton (premium grade).

2. Demand Structure Divergence
- Premium demand: Sustained growth in demand from the polyurethane foam catalyst segment—particularly strong in the Yangtze River Delta manufacturing cluster—drives demand for low-VOC-emission products, supporting Senfeida’s premium quotation of RMB 66,000/ton.
- Mid-to-lower-tier demand: Trading distributors capture market share through large-volume procurement to reduce costs—e.g., Shandong Mantanghong secures volume at RMB 7,500/ton—but product purity and service capability remain questionable.

3. Technical Barriers and Cost Pressures
- In synthesis processes, optimizing the molar ratio of N,N-dimethyl-1,3-propanediamine to propylene oxide can elevate yield to 53%; however, raw material price volatility (e.g., isopropanol) compresses profit margins.
- Impurity control challenges: Close boiling points of dimethylaminopropyl isopropanol and N,N-diisopropanol-N-propenylamine complicate distillation, limiting maximum purity to 99.3%, thereby constraining premium-market pricing.

III. Competitive Landscape and Supplier Strategies
1. Supplier-Type Differentiation
- Integrated service providers: e.g., Tianmingyuan Chemical (Shanghai), offering end-to-end supply chain solutions—including customized packaging and import/export agency services—command higher pricing but enjoy strong customer retention.
- Technology-focused manufacturers: e.g., Shanghai Jiabolitong, concentrating on high-purity and specialty-grade products for R&D and premium manufacturing clients, maintain pricing independence from general market fluctuations.
- Trading distributors: e.g., Shandong Mantanghong, capitalizing on low-cost raw materials and economies of scale to compete aggressively on price in mid-to-lower-tier segments.

2. Regional Market Strategies
- Yangtze River Delta: Emphasizes localized service (e.g., 24-hour response) and regulatory compliance (e.g., hazardous chemical licensing), resulting in generally higher pricing versus other regions.
- Shandong/Jiangsu: Leverages port logistics efficiency and bulk raw material procurement to minimize costs, prioritizing price competition—though service response speed remains limited.

IV. Forward Outlook (April–June 2026)
1. Price Trend Forecast
- Short term: Prices are expected to oscillate within RMB 8,500–11,000/ton, influenced by isopropanol raw material volatility and regional supply-demand imbalances; premium-market pricing (RMB 65,000–66,000/ton) will persist.
- Medium term: Should crude oil prices decline or isopropanol production capacity expand, easing cost pressures, prices may gradually soften to RMB 8,000–9,000/ton.

2. Market Opportunities
- Premium segment: Stricter environmental regulations are accelerating demand for low-VOC catalysts; technology-oriented manufacturers can expand market share through product upgrades.
- Regional collaboration: Yangtze River Delta suppliers could jointly establish cross-regional warehousing networks to balance supply-demand dynamics and reduce logistics costs—enhancing overall competitiveness.

3. Risk Warnings
- Sharp volatility in isopropanol prices (e.g., >50% weekly decline in late March 2026) may delay cost pass-through, necessitating close monitoring of supplier inventory management strategies.
- Excessive price competition in the low-end segment risks quality deterioration, potentially undermining industry credibility over the long term.

More Related Products Prices

Aluminum chlorohydrate Polyacrylamide sodium acetate Citric acid powdered activated carbon Oxalic acid Sodium hypochlorite N,N-Dimethylacetamide Sulfamic acid sodium acetate trihydrate Iron sesquisulfate Triethylamine Diethanolamine Dimethylamine 2-[(Carboxymethyl)thio]benzoic acid Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether Ethylene glycol diacetate N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone Trichloroethylene Ferric chloride

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison