Post My RFQ |
Home > GuideTrends  > Fine Chemicals  > Composite carbon source (alcohols)

Composite carbon source (alcohols)

  • 185CNY/TON Updated: 2026-08-02
  • Price change (DoD): 0
    Average price (3M):185 CNY/TON
    Price Level(1Y):Low
    Follow Comparison
Prices

Composite carbon source (alcohols) Prices Trends in China

Select Spec:

Composite carbon source (alcohols) Prices sources

Reg Spec 2026/07/31 2026/08/01 2026/08/02 ChangeUnit Comparison

Composite carbon source (alcohols) Market Analysis

Composite Carbon Source (Alcohol-Based) Commercial Market Intelligence Report (June 2026)

I. Price Dynamics
1. Henan Huiyihai Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.
- Quotation Period: June 16–22, 2026
100,000 mg/L COD-equivalent: RMB 120–185 per ton (as low as RMB 120/ton via select channels—down 35% from early-month levels)
Light-yellow product with COD > 1,000,000 mg/L: No official quotation disclosed; however, comparable high-concentration neutral products (e.g., COD ≥ 1,000,000 mg/L) are priced at RMB 1,500–2,200 per ton in the Zhengzhou region.
- Drivers of Price Volatility:
Low-concentration products (100,000 mg/L COD-equivalent): Prices continue declining due to overcapacity and weak demand.
High-concentration products: Prices remain elevated, supported by ethanol feedstock costs.

2. Henan Kaijie Water Treatment Co., Ltd.
- Quotation Date: June 22, 2026
COD 900,000 mg/L (neutral, delivered in Zhengzhou): RMB 1,100 per ton
Complementary microbial agents: Denitrifying/nitrifying bacteria with viable cell counts of 10–20 billion CFU/g; priced at RMB 50–80 per kilogram
Market Positioning: Focuses on high-concentration products; premium pricing underpinned by proprietary low-temperature composite manufacturing technology.

3. Regional Price Differentials
- Henan (Zhengzhou), primary production base: 100,000 mg/L COD-equivalent products priced 40–50% lower than in Anhui (Henan: RMB 120–200/ton vs. Anhui’s estimated RMB 240–300/ton)
- High-concentration products (e.g., COD ≥ 800,000 mg/L): Henan quoted at RMB 1,100/ton; Anhui prices may rise to RMB 1,300–1,500/ton due to higher logistics costs.

II. Market Drivers
1. Demand-Side Factors
- Municipal Wastewater Upgrading: Growing demand for treating low carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) ratio wastewater is boosting consumption of high-COD products (≥500,000 mg/L); the market size is projected to exceed RMB 18 billion in 2026.
- Industrial Wastewater Applications: Chemical and food-processing industries increasingly require low-residue, shock-load-resistant carbon sources—accelerating demand growth for high-concentration products faster than standard variants.
- Policy Impact: Stricter total nitrogen (TN) discharge limits are prompting downstream users to increase dosing volumes, potentially driving short-term price increases.

2. Supply-Side Factors
- Production Concentration: Henan accounts for over 60% of China’s national production capacity; large-scale manufacturers (e.g., Baoxin, Kaijie) achieve cost advantages, granting them supply-side dominance.
- Technological Barriers: High-concentration products (e.g., COD ≥ 800,000 mg/L) require low-temperature composite processing—a technical bottleneck constraining supply expansion and sustaining elevated pricing.
- Feedstock Costs: Ethanol and molasses prices—subject to agricultural commodity cycles—remained stable in June 2026, providing steady cost support without major fluctuations.

III. Competitive Landscape
1. Leading Enterprises
| Company Name | Core Competitive Advantage | Pricing Strategy | Market Share |
|-------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
| Henan Baoxin Environmental Protection | Economies of scale + logistics advantage | RMB 650/ton for COD ≥ 400,000 mg/L products | Dominant in Henan hub |
| Henan Kaijie Water Treatment | Full vertical integration + rapid tech iteration | RMB 1,130/ton for COD ≥ 800,000 mg/L products | Price setter in high-COD segment |
| Chizhou Xinyu Chemical | Localized supply + brand premium | RMB 800/ton for COD ≥ 400,000 mg/L products | Regional leader in Anhui |

2. Emerging Players
- Zhengzhou Zhengyuan Environmental Protection: Employs controlled-release carrier technology—reducing required carbon source dosage by 15–20% and delivering lower overall operational costs versus industry average.
- Nanjing Qingquan Water Treatment: Utilizes targeted fermentation of biomass molasses—achieving >92% total nitrogen removal efficiency; serves over 100 municipal wastewater treatment plants across the Yangtze River Delta region.

IV. Future Trend Outlook
1. Price Forecast
- Baseline Price Ranges: 100,000 mg/L COD-equivalent products expected to stabilize at RMB 120–200/ton; high-concentration products (e.g., COD ≥ 800,000 mg/L) may rise modestly to RMB 1,150–1,200/ton driven by demand growth.
- Volatility Risks: Should agricultural commodity cycles push up ethanol or molasses prices, composite carbon source prices could follow with a 5–10% increase—though technological advancements and capacity expansion will partially offset such cost pressures.

2. Industry Transformation
- Rising Share of High-Efficiency Products: Accelerated demand growth for COD ≥ 500,000 mg/L products is lifting the market’s average price level.
- Regulatory & Environmental Pressures: Increasingly stringent environmental policies will sustain demand momentum; however, broader adoption and scaling will dampen price volatility—establishing a self-reinforcing cycle of \"demand growth → supply expansion → price stabilization.\"
- Regional Structure: Henan’s production hub advantage will consolidate further; high-logistics-cost regions (e.g., Anhui) may maintain competitiveness through localized production or brand premiums—the inter-regional price gap is unlikely to narrow significantly in the near term.

V. Procurement Recommendations
1. Specification Selection: Choose appropriate COD concentration based on application context (e.g., 400,000–600,000 mg/L typical for municipal wastewater; ≥800,000 mg/L often required for industrial effluents) to avoid over-specification (“over-provisioning”) or underperformance (“under-provisioning”).
2. Key Technical Parameters: Prioritize verification of COD equivalence, BOD/COD ratio, and impurity levels (e.g., heavy metals, salt content).
3. Supplier Evaluation: Prefer vendors holding valid production licenses, third-party test reports, and documented case studies; long-term contracts may enable volume-based discounts.
4. Timing Strategy: Monitor feedstock markets (especially ethanol and molasses); procure during periods of relatively low raw material pricing to minimize procurement costs.

More Related Products Prices

Polyacrylamide Aluminum chlorohydrate sodium acetate Citric acid powdered activated carbon Oxalic acid Sodium hypochlorite N,N-Dimethylacetamide Triethylamine Iron sesquisulfate sodium acetate trihydrate Diethanolamine Sulfamic acid Trichloroethylene Ethylene glycol diacetate Dimethylamine Diethylene glycol monobutyl ether Ferric chloride N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone D-Glucose monohydrate

Guidechem assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this site. The information contained in this site is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness, fitness for purpose or timeliness.

 
 
My Follow
Comparison
No Selected:0 indicators Follow Clear
Tip: Curve comparison supports up to 10 indicators, and the display order of indicators can be adjusted by dragging them,View Comparison